Engagement · Education

Education

Our journal club: two open sessions reading one paper at a time, including the research our own enzyme comes from.

In plain language

We developed Journal Club presentations to help students explore current research related to our project and better understand how scientific discoveries can be translated into real-world applications. Two sessions ran in 2026, both virtual and both open to anyone who wanted to attend.

Two
sessions held, 18 July and 29 August 2026
Eight
student presenters, rotated deliberately
One hour
virtual, open to the public

The method is section by section through one paper, then open discussion. Session 02 was recorded; Session 01 was not. This page records what we read, who presented, how a session is actually produced, and what we got wrong.

01 · Why we run it

A small group presents; everyone else interrupts


Our presentations covered research topics connected to biotechnology, nutrition, gut microbiology and human health. Each session, a group of student presenters walks the room through one published paper in order, abstract, methods, results, discussion, and then the floor opens. Nobody is expected to arrive having understood it. That is the point of doing it together, and it is why the format is a presentation followed by questions rather than a reading assignment.

Journal Club was important to our project because it encouraged us to look beyond our own research and understand the work of scientists developing new approaches to complex health problems. Preparing presentations required us to read and interpret scientific research, identify the most important findings, and communicate those findings in a way that other students could understand.

This helped us recognize that scientific communication is just as important as scientific discovery. A strong research idea has greater potential to create an impact when people can understand its purpose, evidence and possible applications, a lesson that transferred directly into how we rewrote our own project description for the fundraising video and for this wiki.

The presentations also created an opportunity for students with different interests and levels of scientific experience to learn from one another. By discussing topics ranging from gut bacteria and child nutrition to engineered microorganisms and potential antidepressant production, we connected individual research papers to broader questions about biotechnology and human health. Rather than simply reading research independently, presenting it to a group encouraged us to ask questions, explain unfamiliar concepts aloud, and consider how the findings could relate to our own Texas iGEM project.

We wanted the habit of reading methods closely, because that is where a result is won or lost.

02 · Session 01 · July

Microbes as factories


Session 01

18 July 2026 · 6:00 – 7:00 PM CT · Virtual

Microbial production of psilocybin antidepressants through engineered non-natural biosynthetic pathways

Why this paper

It examines how University of Houston researchers are engineering microorganisms to produce promising antidepressant compounds through non-natural biosynthetic pathways, connecting biotechnology with future approaches to mental-health treatment and drug development. It is the same move we make with FAAH in E. coli Nissle, take a biosynthetic capability an organism does not have and install it, in a system far enough from our own that the engineering logic is easier to see than the biology. Reading a parallel project is a better way to learn pathway engineering than reading your own, because nobody in the room is defending it.

Presenters

Nikita Vijay, Shivansh Shukla, Raisha Chakrabarti, Arjun Popuri

Promotion

A student-designed flyer carrying the presentation topic, meeting time and virtual meeting information, posted to Instagram, Facebook and the team website.

Journal Club 01 flyer: Texas iGEM Journal Club, 18 July 2026 at 6:00 PM CST, topic and meeting link, with photographs of the five presenters.
Journal Club 01 flyer, 18 July.

Not recorded

No recording exists. Meeting recording sat behind a paid workspace tier we did not have, and we had not checked before the session began. This is the single clearest operational failure of the year and the reason the role split described below exists.

03 · Session 02 · August

The organism our own enzyme comes from


Session 02

29 August 2026 · 5:00 PM CT · Virtual · Recorded

Header of the paper: A human gut Faecalibacterium prausnitzii fatty acid amide hydrolase, by Jiye Cheng, Siddarth Venkatesh, Ke Ke, Michael J. Barratt and Jeffrey I. Gordon.
A human gut Faecalibacterium prausnitzii fatty acid amide hydrolase, the paper read in Session 02.

Why this paper

It explores how researchers are studying Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, a beneficial gut bacterium associated with growth, to understand how engineered microbes could improve nutrient use and restore disrupted gut functions in undernourished children. That is our project, stated as a research question by people who are not us. Reading it as a group meant the whole team, including members who never enter the lab, understood what our construct actually is and why we chose that organism as the source of the gene.

Presenters

Alyssa Janco, Ganeev Jaswal, Livsharan Puchakayala, Neel Heblikar

Recorded

Yes. The recording problem from Session 01 was solved by handing host controls to an account with recording rights, after a trial run on the morning of the session.

Promotion

A student-designed flyer carrying the presentation topic, meeting time and virtual meeting information, posted to Instagram, Facebook and the team website was built as a reusable journal club template rather than a one-off.

Journal Club 02 flyer: Texas iGEM Journal Club, 29 August 2026 at 5:00 PM CST, topic and meeting link, with photographs of the four presenters.
Journal Club 02 flyer, 29 August.
Jeffrey Gordon photographed in his laboratory beside the New England Journal of Medicine paper on a microbiota-directed food intervention for undernourished children.
Figure 1. The clinical work this session sits next to. Credit: Slide by Dr. Nalini Raghunathan.
Two-column slide: how DNA gets into E. coli by transduction, transformation and conjugation, and why E. coli is used.
Figure 2. Background material: why E. coli is the organism students learn on. Credit: Slide by Dr. Nalini Raghunathan.
04 · Operations

How a session gets made


To make the Journal Club presentations accessible and consistent, we created informational flyers that included the presentation topic, meeting time and virtual meeting information. The flyers allowed students to understand the focus of each meeting before attending and provided a clear way to share the opportunity with others.

Running an open session is mostly logistics, and the logistics are where we improved most between July and August. The team ended up splitting into three standing roles rather than scrambling each time.

The production route left to right: choose the paper, assign presenters, make the flyer, post to socials, and run, record and archive, with the owning role beneath each step.
Figure 3. Five steps to produce one session, and the three standing roles that own them.
What changed between Session 01 and Session 02
Session 01 · ad hocSession 02 · three roles
FlyerRequested days ahead, briefed verballyContent role owns flyer and session description
PresentersAssigned, then reshuffledAssigned once, rotated deliberately between sessions
SocialsHandled by whoever had the loginSocials role posts with proper titles, tags and links
RecordingNo plan until the day; nothing capturedContent Management owns link, recording and archive
TemplateBuilt from scratchReused from Session 02 onward
The project's four-month engagement timeline with public-facing work on the upper track and expert consultation on the lower one, the two journal clubs marked among the upper ticks.
Figure 4. Where the two journal clubs sit in the wider engagement year.
The $3 Meal Plan production route: design, cost, document, deliver.
Figure 5. The adjacent public-engagement pipeline, for comparison.

Both flyers carried the presentation topic, the meeting time and the virtual meeting information, so students knew the focus before attending and could pass the invitation on. The second was built as a reusable template, which is why a third session will take an afternoon rather than a week.

05 · Limitations

What we got wrong


One limitation of our Journal Club was that scientific papers can be difficult for students to understand without prior experience reading research. To strengthen the presentations, our student presenters needed to focus not only on accurately representing the research but also on making complicated scientific ideas approachable. The first session leaned too far toward accuracy and lost part of the room; the second was better because the presenters had seen that happen.

This experience taught us to consider our audience when communicating science, and to explain research in a way that encourages questions rather than making the material feel inaccessible. It is the same lesson the expo taught the public engagement team in the same month, arrived at independently: the material you are proudest of is rarely the material that lands.

Overall, creating and presenting Journal Club presentations gave us experience interpreting scientific literature, communicating research, and connecting discoveries from different areas of biotechnology to real-world problems. It showed us that research is not only about generating new knowledge, but also about sharing that knowledge with others and creating opportunities for people to engage with science.